Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences

Module Information
Good morning
EPH2023  - Introduction to Quantitative Research Methods

Period 3: from 8-1-2024 to 2-2-2024
Co-requisites:
None
Coordinator: Vasse, R.
ECTS credits: 3
Language of instruction: English

Publication dates timetable/results in the Student Portal

Deadline publication timetable
The date on which the timetable of this module is available: 15-12-2023

Deadline publication final result
The date on which the final grade of this module is available: 26-2-2024


Resit booking

Exam booking for a test in current academic year (resit)
You will be booked automatically for the resit in one of our resit periods. You may check our calenders to find out which modules can be retaken and when: https://intranet.maastrichtuniversity.nl/nl/fhml-studenten/studieverloop/wanneer-wat
As of one week before the resit test takes place, you can check in Student Portal if you are booked correctly: Student Portal > My Courses > More actions. The test will also be visible in your time table.

Exam booking for a test from a previous academic year (exam only)
All students who have not passed the test for this module in a previous academic year, will be booked automatically for the test during the regular block period. You will be enrolled in the new course in Canvas but not scheduled for a tutorial group and other educational activities. If you do not wish to participate in this test at the end of the regular block period please de-register via askFHML.

Resit date: 9-7-2024

Though great care has been taken to assure the accuracy of the information on fhmlweb, the FHML cannot be held responsible for possible printing errors, incomplete information, or misinterpretations. Additionally, the FHML reserves the right to make changes to this information.


Course information

Description: EN:

The core topic is program evaluation. Health professionals implement Public health programs at different levels (for example, at individual, community, and national levels), and this often occurs simultaneously. Therefore, the evaluation of such programs is complicated. Ideally, such programs embed evaluation from the start. Outcome evaluation investigates if program goals are met for example increase of knowledge or decrease in health complaints. . Process evaluation investigates how the program is implemented by professionals and participants Process data can help explain the outcomes for example certain goals may not be met because corresponding activities were not implemented at all or did not fulfill participants’ needs. In this module, students work with real-world data and apply statistical analyses they are familiar with (Chi-square tests, t-tests and regression analyses).

Experimental designs (RCTs) are the gold standard for outcome evaluation. However, randomization at individual level is not always feasible or appropriate in public health programs.

In week 1, quasi-experimental designs are introduced as good alternatives for programs at individual level. In addition, students learn how to compensate for design weaknesses within statistical analyses for example combining process data and outcome data or controlling for baseline differences between groups caused by non-randomization. 

In week 2, cluster randomized trials are introduced as good alternatives for multilevel programs that not only promote individual behavior change but also environmental change. The implications for sample size calculation are explained. 

In week 3, participatory action research is introduced as good example of mixed-methods approaches. The term “mixed-methods” refers to the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. The term “participatory” refers to giving voice to participants throughout all phases of the program that is development, implementation and evaluation.

Goals: EN:
The main goal of EPH2023 is to enable students to select good alternative research methods for program evaluation when the gold standard (RCT) is not feasible or not appropriate.
  • Expert:
  • Organizes and applies health definitions within the context of health interventions, policies, and research
  • Analyses real-world data on health status and inequalities
  • Applies techniques to analyse and interpret correlation and causation between variables
  • Examines and analyses the effects of confounding and interaction
  • Investigator:
  • Describes advantages and disadvantages of standard research designs and data collection
  • Matches and applies intermediate-level statistical analyses to research data
  • Distinguishes among various categories (i.e. types) of public health interventions at community, organization and policy levels
  • Matches research methods and data analysis to specific intervention types
  • Applies critical academic thinking tools to dilemmas in public health policy, practice, and scientific research
  • Tests principles of research ethics and integrity against case studies from practice
  • Identifies and contrasts differing targets (aims), & methods of implementing, financing and applying public health research projects
  • Professional:
  • Engages feedback from staff and students actively
  • Behaves in a respectful, professional and reliable manner in tutor groups, practicals and group work
  • Contributes actively and positively within tutor groups and training tutorial groups
Key words: EN:
Quantitative research, Mixed-methods, Program evaluation, Quasi-experimental designs
Literature: This is the link to Keylinks, our online reference list.  
Teaching methods:
  • Assignment(s)
  • Lecture(s)
  • Problem Based Learning
  • Skills
Assessments methods:
  • Assignment
  • Written exam

This page was last modified on:26-4-2023
No rights can be derived from data in this information system.       © 2024 J. van Emmerik